The Court's own description of what the opinion held.
Supreme Court
See what the Court decided, what it said, and the official docket and opinion that prove it.
Every holding below comes from the Court's own published opinion or docket.Filings, orders, dates, and the case's official public history.
Direct links to the opinion and official record—never a news summary.
What the Court did most recently
Newest docket activity first, with the Court's own language kept attached.
National Republican Congressional Committee v. Brown
Because the Fourth Circuit likely lacked jurisdiction to review the Federal Communications Commission’s lowest-unit-charge requirements while the candidates’ application for review remained pending before the …
National Park Service v. National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States
Because the government has established that it is likely to prevail in showing that the Trust lacks Article III standing to challenge the East Wing project in federal court, that it would likely suffer irrepar…
Trump v. California
The Government’s application to stay the District Court’s injunction in 26A124—which forbids the Government to implement §§2 and 3 of Executive Order No. 14399—is granted; the application for a stay in 26A139 …
Every Supreme Court term on file
Search by party or docket, then narrow to an October Term. Open any result for its complete Vote Files timeline and official opinion.
Reading the docket…
Every case links to the Court's own docket. Where an opinion is available, the holding shown here is the Court's language and the opinion link opens the Court's PDF.
Case names, docket movement, orders, opinions, and the Court's statement of what it held come from supremecourt.gov. Vote Files keeps that source language attached and links back to the official docket and opinion.
A docket update is not necessarily a merits decision. The record labels the date and source; it does not invent a winner or summarize beyond the Court's own words.